1915.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:16:41 GMT 2002 1915.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.982 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=49.926 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 1915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.923 msec 1915.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.982/27.339/49.926/12.116 ms 1915.ms:16.982 27.339 49.926 12.116 1915.loss:0 1930.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:31:41 GMT 2002 1930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.080 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.930 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.929 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.937 msec 1930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.925 msec 1930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.930/32.360/39.937/7.418 ms 1930.ms:19.930 32.360 39.937 7.418 1930.loss:0 1945.ping:Thu Feb 21 19:46:41 GMT 2002 1945.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.328 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.951 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 1945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1945.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/22.627/29.951/3.888 ms 1945.ms:19.948 22.627 29.951 3.888 1945.loss:0 2000.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:01:42 GMT 2002 2000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.223 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.956 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 2000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 2000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.949/28.407/32.223/4.320 ms 2000.ms:19.949 28.407 32.223 4.320 2000.loss:0 2015.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:16:42 GMT 2002 2015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=36.336 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.955 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.954 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.961 msec 2015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=49.952 msec 2015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.955/39.231/49.952/6.490 ms 2015.ms:29.955 39.231 49.952 6.490 2015.loss:0 2030.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:31:41 GMT 2002 2030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.103 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.945 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 2030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.614 msec 2030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.614/30.307/32.103/0.926 ms 2030.ms:29.614 30.307 32.103 0.926 2030.loss:0 2045.ping:Thu Feb 21 20:46:41 GMT 2002 2045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.583 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 2045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 2045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/22.670/29.941/3.902 ms 2045.loss:0 2045.ms:19.941 22.670 29.941 3.902 2100.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:01:41 GMT 2002 2100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.811 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 2100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/20.319/21.811/0.761 ms 2100.ms:19.944 20.319 21.811 0.761 2100.loss:0 2115.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:16:41 GMT 2002 2115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.438 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.931 msec 2115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 2115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.931/24.433/29.939/4.582 ms 2115.ms:19.931 24.433 29.939 4.582 2115.loss:0 2130.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:31:41 GMT 2002 2130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.560 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 2130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/22.065/29.946/3.950 ms 2130.ms:19.933 22.065 29.946 3.950 2130.loss:0 2145.ping:Thu Feb 21 21:46:41 GMT 2002 2145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.707 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.953 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 2145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.960 msec 2145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.707/25.896/29.960/4.963 ms 2145.ms:19.707 25.896 29.960 4.963 2145.loss:0 2200.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:01:41 GMT 2002 2200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.145 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 2200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 2200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.942/20.387/22.145/0.888 ms 2200.ms:19.942 20.387 22.145 0.888 2200.loss:0 2215.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:16:41 GMT 2002 2215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.292 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 2215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 2215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.292/18.608/19.960/2.662 ms 2215.ms:13.292 18.608 19.960 2.662 2215.loss:0 2230.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:31:41 GMT 2002 2230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.632 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 2230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 2230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.632/19.286/19.951/1.330 ms 2230.ms:16.632 19.286 19.951 1.330 2230.loss:0 2245.ping:Thu Feb 21 22:46:41 GMT 2002 2245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.311 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 2245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 2245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.957/20.030/20.311/0.166 ms 2245.ms:19.957 20.030 20.311 0.166 2245.loss:0 2300.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:01:48 GMT 2002 2300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.180 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.059 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.901 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 2300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.059/20.203/22.180/1.043 ms 2300.ms:19.059 20.203 22.180 1.043 2300.loss:0 2315.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:17:00 GMT 2002 2315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.409 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.924 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 2315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 2315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.924/22.426/29.937/3.879 ms 2315.ms:19.924 22.426 29.937 3.879 2315.loss:0 2330.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:31:42 GMT 2002 2330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.649 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.932 msec 2330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.870 msec 2330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/31.065/39.932/7.882 ms 2330.ms:19.935 31.065 39.932 7.882 2330.loss:0 2345.ping:Thu Feb 21 23:46:56 GMT 2002 2345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.742 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.934 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.781 msec 2345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 2345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 2345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 2345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.742/23.865/39.781/7.958 ms 2345.ms:19.742 23.865 39.781 7.958 2345.loss:0 0000.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:01:41 GMT 2002 0000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=27.273 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.951 msec 0000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 27.273/29.413/29.952/1.075 ms 0000.ms:27.273 29.413 29.952 1.075 0000.loss:0 0015.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:16:41 GMT 2002 0015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=42.727 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.952 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.968 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.947 msec 0015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 0015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.968/32.510/42.727/8.126 ms 0015.ms:19.968 32.510 42.727 8.126 0015.loss:0 0030.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:31:42 GMT 2002 0030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=56.553 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=79.576 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=59.810 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.652 msec 0030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.862 msec 0030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 39.652/55.090/79.576/14.795 ms 0030.ms:39.652 55.090 79.576 14.795 0030.loss:0 0045.ping:Fri Feb 22 00:46:41 GMT 2002 0045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=12.704 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.967 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.973 msec 0045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 12.704/18.513/19.973/2.907 ms 0045.ms:12.704 18.513 19.973 2.907 0045.loss:0 0100.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:01:41 GMT 2002 0100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.703 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.770 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 0100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.769 msec 0100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.703/21.028/29.944/4.736 ms 0100.ms:15.703 21.028 29.944 4.736 0100.loss:0 0115.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:16:41 GMT 2002 0115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.718 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.964 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.941/22.508/29.964/3.879 ms 0115.ms:19.941 22.508 29.964 3.879 0115.loss:0 0130.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:31:41 GMT 2002 0130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=29.223 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=129.945 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=89.940 msec 0130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.938 msec 0130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.223/63.796/129.945/39.926 ms 0130.ms:29.223 63.796 129.945 39.926 0130.loss:0 0145.ping:Fri Feb 22 01:46:41 GMT 2002 0145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.227 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.942 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/24.202/29.946/4.712 ms 0145.ms:19.939 24.202 29.946 4.712 0145.loss:0 0200.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:01:42 GMT 2002 0200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.415 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=18.526 msec 0200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.526/20.757/25.415/2.393 ms 0200.ms:18.526 20.757 25.415 2.393 0200.loss:0 0215.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:16:41 GMT 2002 0215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=31.770 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.940 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 0215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.943 msec 0215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.941/34.307/39.943/4.652 ms 0215.ms:29.941 34.307 39.943 4.652 0215.loss:0 0230.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:31:41 GMT 2002 0230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=27.810 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.930 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.938 msec 0230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 27.810/31.513/39.938/4.293 ms 0230.ms:27.810 31.513 39.938 4.293 0230.loss:0 0245.ping:Fri Feb 22 02:46:42 GMT 2002 0245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=167.495 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 0245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.938/49.451/167.495/59.022 ms 0245.ms:19.938 49.451 167.495 59.022 0245.loss:0 0300.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:01:42 GMT 2002 0300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=49.251 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.943 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.951 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.946 msec 0300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.943/37.807/49.251/7.263 ms 0300.ms:29.943 37.807 49.251 7.263 0300.loss:0 0315.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:16:41 GMT 2002 0315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=39.421 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.958 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=39.949 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=39.958 msec 0315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.955 msec 0315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.958/37.848/39.958/3.952 ms 0315.ms:29.958 37.848 39.958 3.952 0315.loss:0 0330.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:31:44 GMT 2002 0330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.803 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.929 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.917 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.919 msec 0330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.902 msec 0330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.919/27.094/29.929/3.925 ms 0330.ms:19.919 27.094 29.929 3.925 0330.loss:0 0345.ping:Fri Feb 22 03:46:42 GMT 2002 0345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=37.260 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.944 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.945 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.931 msec 0345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=59.944 msec 0345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.931/37.404/59.944/13.234 ms 0345.ms:19.931 37.404 59.944 13.234 0345.loss:0 0400.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:01:42 GMT 2002 0400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.376 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.947 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 0400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 0400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/26.227/29.947/4.577 ms 0400.ms:19.933 26.227 29.947 4.577 0400.loss:0 0415.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:16:43 GMT 2002 0415.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.767 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.918 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.918 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.865 msec 0415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.707 msec 0415.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.767/23.635/29.918/5.123 ms 0415.ms:18.767 23.635 29.918 5.123 0415.loss:0 0430.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:31:42 GMT 2002 0430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=28.692 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.932 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.934 msec 0430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 0430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/25.685/29.934/4.721 ms 0430.ms:19.935 25.685 29.934 4.721 0430.loss:0 0445.ping:Fri Feb 22 04:46:41 GMT 2002 0445.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.498 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.805 msec 0445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.931 msec 0445.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.498/22.622/29.931/6.367 ms 0445.ms:13.498 22.622 29.931 6.367 0445.loss:0 0500.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:01:42 GMT 2002 0500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=34.304 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.942 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.934 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.930 msec 0500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.452 msec 0500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.452/30.712/34.304/1.812 ms 0500.ms:29.452 30.712 34.304 1.812 0500.loss:0 0515.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:16:42 GMT 2002 0515.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=148.241 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=159.941 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=169.947 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=129.943 msec 0515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=119.947 msec 0515.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 119.947/145.603/169.947/18.492 ms 0515.ms:119.947 145.603 169.947 18.492 0515.loss:0 0530.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:31:41 GMT 2002 0530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=33.999 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.956 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.954 msec 0530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.938/30.759/33.999/1.634 ms 0530.ms:29.938 30.759 33.999 1.634 0530.loss:0 0545.ping:Fri Feb 22 05:46:41 GMT 2002 0545.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.250 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 0545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 0545.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.250/19.209/19.957/1.482 ms 0545.ms:16.250 19.209 19.957 1.482 0545.loss:0 0600.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:01:41 GMT 2002 0600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.538 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=33.358 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 0600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/23.149/33.358/5.202 ms 0600.ms:19.945 23.149 33.358 5.202 0600.loss:0 0615.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:16:41 GMT 2002 0615.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.488 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 0615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 0615.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.488/19.644/19.952/0.605 ms 0615.ms:18.488 19.644 19.952 0.605 0615.loss:0 0630.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:31:41 GMT 2002 0630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.450 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.937/20.043/20.450/0.255 ms 0630.ms:19.937 20.043 20.450 0.255 0630.loss:0 0645.ping:Fri Feb 22 06:46:42 GMT 2002 0645.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.923 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 0645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0645.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.923/19.139/19.948/1.612 ms 0645.ms:15.923 19.139 19.948 1.612 0645.loss:0 0700.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:01:41 GMT 2002 0700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.656 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.893 msec 0700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 0700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.893/20.477/22.656/1.097 ms 0700.ms:19.893 20.477 22.656 1.097 0700.loss:0 0715.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:16:41 GMT 2002 0715.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=24.122 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.938 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0715.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/22.778/29.938/3.932 ms 0715.loss:0 0715.ms:19.939 22.778 29.938 3.932 0730.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:31:43 GMT 2002 0730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.573 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.916 msec 0730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.573/19.867/19.953/0.213 ms 0730.ms:19.573 19.867 19.953 0.213 0730.loss:0 0745.ping:Fri Feb 22 07:46:41 GMT 2002 0745.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.892 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0745.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.892/19.144/19.961/1.626 ms 0745.ms:15.892 19.144 19.961 1.626 0745.loss:0 0800.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:01:41 GMT 2002 0800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.077 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 0800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.961 msec 0800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.948/25.974/29.961/4.870 ms 0800.ms:19.948 25.974 29.961 4.870 0800.loss:0 0815.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:16:41 GMT 2002 0815.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.447 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.950 msec 0815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0815.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.953/22.652/29.950/3.895 ms 0815.ms:19.953 22.652 29.950 3.895 0815.loss:0 0830.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:31:41 GMT 2002 0830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.823 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 0830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.969 msec 0830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.823/19.132/19.969/1.656 ms 0830.ms:15.823 19.132 19.969 1.656 0830.loss:0 0845.ping:Fri Feb 22 08:46:41 GMT 2002 0845.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=29.965 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.939 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 0845.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.939/21.945/29.965/4.012 ms 0845.ms:19.939 21.945 29.965 4.012 0845.loss:0 0900.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:01:41 GMT 2002 0900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=32.879 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.952 msec 0900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 0900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/28.530/32.879/4.446 ms 0900.ms:19.933 28.530 32.879 4.446 0900.loss:0 0915.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:16:41 GMT 2002 0915.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.427 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 0915.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 0915.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0915.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0915.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.935/20.640/23.427/1.404 ms 0915.ms:19.935 20.640 23.427 1.404 0915.loss:0 0930.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:31:40 GMT 2002 0930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=13.463 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=109.949 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.950 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 0930.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 0930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0930.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 13.463/36.650/109.949/36.735 ms 0930.ms:13.463 36.650 109.949 36.735 0930.loss:0 0945.ping:Fri Feb 22 09:46:41 GMT 2002 0945.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.206 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=49.946 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.959 msec 0945.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 0945.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 0945.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 0945.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.206/27.604/49.946/11.918 ms 0945.ms:18.206 27.604 49.946 11.918 0945.loss:0 1000.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:01:41 GMT 2002 1000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.874 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.963 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.906 msec 1000.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1000.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.874/19.327/19.963/1.236 ms 1000.ms:16.874 19.327 19.963 1.236 1000.loss:0 1015.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:16:40 GMT 2002 1015.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.330 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.933 msec 1015.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1015.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1015.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1015.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.933/20.626/23.330/1.352 ms 1015.ms:19.933 20.626 23.330 1.352 1015.loss:0 1030.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:31:41 GMT 2002 1030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.833 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1030.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1030.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/20.532/22.833/1.157 ms 1030.ms:19.952 20.532 22.833 1.157 1030.loss:0 1045.ping:Fri Feb 22 10:46:41 GMT 2002 1045.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.369 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.753 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1045.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1045.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1045.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1045.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.951/22.398/29.753/3.796 ms 1045.ms:19.951 22.398 29.753 3.796 1045.loss:0 1100.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:01:41 GMT 2002 1100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.623 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.891 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1100.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1100.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.891/20.270/21.623/0.688 ms 1100.ms:19.891 20.270 21.623 0.688 1100.loss:0 1115.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:16:41 GMT 2002 1115.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=12.115 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.936 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1115.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.940 msec 1115.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1115.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1115.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 12.115/20.376/29.936/5.660 ms 1115.ms:12.115 20.376 29.936 5.660 1115.loss:0 1130.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:31:41 GMT 2002 1130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.954 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.924 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1130.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1130.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.924/20.540/22.954/1.216 ms 1130.ms:19.924 20.540 22.954 1.216 1130.loss:0 1145.ping:Fri Feb 22 11:46:40 GMT 2002 1145.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.774 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=169.940 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1145.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1145.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1145.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1145.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.774/49.707/169.940/60.118 ms 1145.ms:18.774 49.707 169.940 60.118 1145.loss:0 1200.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:01:41 GMT 2002 1200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.418 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.903 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 1200.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1200.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.418/19.036/19.961/1.817 ms 1200.ms:15.418 19.036 19.961 1.817 1200.loss:0 1215.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:16:40 GMT 2002 1215.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.399 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.963 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1215.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.962 msec 1215.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1215.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1215.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.399/18.844/19.963/2.224 ms 1215.ms:14.399 18.844 19.963 2.224 1215.loss:0 1230.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:31:41 GMT 2002 1230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.057 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1230.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.951 msec 1230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1230.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.946/23.973/39.951/7.989 ms 1230.ms:19.946 23.973 39.951 7.989 1230.loss:0 1245.ping:Fri Feb 22 12:46:41 GMT 2002 1245.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.028 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.910 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.917 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.895 msec 1245.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.915 msec 1245.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1245.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1245.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.895/20.933/25.028/2.047 ms 1245.ms:19.895 20.933 25.028 2.047 1245.loss:0 1300.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:01:40 GMT 2002 1300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=17.873 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.960 msec 1300.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1300.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.873/19.539/19.960/0.833 ms 1300.ms:17.873 19.539 19.960 0.833 1300.loss:0 1315.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:16:41 GMT 2002 1315.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.454 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.905 msec 1315.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.845 msec 1315.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1315.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1315.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.454/19.210/19.925/1.384 ms 1315.ms:16.454 19.210 19.925 1.384 1315.loss:0 1330.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:31:41 GMT 2002 1330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=23.695 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1330.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1330.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.929/20.691/23.695/1.509 ms 1330.ms:19.929 20.691 23.695 1.509 1330.loss:0 1345.ping:Fri Feb 22 13:46:41 GMT 2002 1345.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.204 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1345.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 1345.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1345.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1345.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.204/19.793/19.944/0.307 ms 1345.ms:19.204 19.793 19.944 0.307 1345.loss:0 1400.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:01:41 GMT 2002 1400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=16.509 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.946 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.937 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.951 msec 1400.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1400.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 16.509/19.257/19.951/1.379 ms 1400.ms:16.509 19.257 19.951 1.379 1400.loss:0 1415.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:16:41 GMT 2002 1415.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=11.637 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.943 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 1415.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1415.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1415.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1415.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 11.637/20.286/29.957/5.809 ms 1415.ms:11.637 20.286 29.957 5.809 1415.loss:0 1430.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:31:42 GMT 2002 1430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=39.538 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.940 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.942 msec 1430.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1430.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.942/25.863/39.538/7.858 ms 1430.ms:19.942 25.863 39.538 7.858 1430.loss:0 1445.ping:Fri Feb 22 14:46:41 GMT 2002 1445.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.161 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.949 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1445.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1445.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1445.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1445.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.161/19.791/19.954/0.339 ms 1445.ms:19.161 19.791 19.954 0.339 1445.loss:0 1500.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:01:41 GMT 2002 1500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.352 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.966 msec 1500.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1500.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.352/18.836/19.966/2.245 ms 1500.ms:14.352 18.836 19.966 2.245 1500.loss:0 1515.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:16:41 GMT 2002 1515.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.603 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.957 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.955 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1515.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1515.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1515.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1515.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/24.284/29.957/4.673 ms 1515.ms:19.952 24.284 29.957 4.673 1515.loss:0 1530.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:31:42 GMT 2002 1530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.011 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.420 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=17.957 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.913 msec 1530.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.778 msec 1530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1530.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.957/19.415/20.011/0.776 ms 1530.ms:17.957 19.415 20.011 0.776 1530.loss:0 1545.ping:Fri Feb 22 15:46:41 GMT 2002 1545.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=18.106 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.920 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.918 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.922 msec 1545.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1545.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1545.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1545.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 18.106/19.557/19.923/0.747 ms 1545.ms:18.106 19.557 19.923 0.747 1545.loss:0 1600.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:01:42 GMT 2002 1600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=28.570 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.950 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.944 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.944 msec 1600.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=39.945 msec 1600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1600.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.944/29.670/39.945/6.351 ms 1600.ms:19.944 29.670 39.945 6.351 1600.loss:0 1615.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:16:41 GMT 2002 1615.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=19.831 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.923 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.891 msec 1615.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.936 msec 1615.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1615.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1615.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.831/19.900/19.936/0.182 ms 1615.ms:19.831 19.900 19.936 0.182 1615.loss:0 1630.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:31:41 GMT 2002 1630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=22.623 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1630.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.952 msec 1630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1630.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.952/22.484/29.937/3.870 ms 1630.ms:19.952 22.484 29.937 3.870 1630.loss:0 1645.ping:Fri Feb 22 16:46:41 GMT 2002 1645.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=21.664 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.959 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.955 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1645.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.956 msec 1645.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1645.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1645.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.947/20.296/21.664/0.689 ms 1645.ms:19.947 20.296 21.664 0.689 1645.loss:0 1700.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:01:42 GMT 2002 1700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=30.113 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=39.934 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.965 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=199.961 msec 1700.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.957 msec 1700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1700.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.957/61.986/199.961/69.385 ms 1700.ms:19.957 61.986 199.961 69.385 1700.loss:0 1715.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:16:41 GMT 2002 1715.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=20.259 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.954 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.948 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.953 msec 1715.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1715.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1715.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1715.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.953/22.014/29.948/3.970 ms 1715.ms:19.953 22.014 29.948 3.970 1715.loss:0 1724.ping:+ date 1724.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:26:33 GMT 2002 1724.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1724.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1724.ping:+ p=11904 1724.ping:+ wait 1724.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1724.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=48.132 msec 1724.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.910 msec 1724.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1724.ping:2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss 1724.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 29.910/39.021/48.132/9.111 ms 1724.ms:29.910 39.021 48.132 9.111 1724.loss:0 1730.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:31:41 GMT 2002 1730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=15.979 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.958 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.947 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.961 msec 1730.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.959 msec 1730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1730.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 15.979/21.160/29.959/4.664 ms 1730.ms:15.979 21.160 29.959 4.664 1730.loss:0 1736.ping:+ date 1736.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:37:24 GMT 2002 1736.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1736.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1736.ping:+ p=12695 1736.ping:+ wait 1736.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1736.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1736.ping:1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss 1736.ms:399 399 399 1736.loss:100 1738.ping:+ date 1738.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:38:32 GMT 2002 1738.ping:+ qping buda.lag.net 1738.ping:+ ping -c 5 buda.lag.net 1738.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.704 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.914 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.941 msec 1738.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1738.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1738.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1738.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.704/22.887/29.941/6.066 ms 1738.ms:14.704 22.887 29.941 6.066 1738.loss:0 1745.ping:Fri Feb 22 17:45:32 GMT 2002 1745.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=25.987 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.901 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.924 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.948 msec 1745.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.945 msec 1745.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1745.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1745.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.945/25.141/29.924/4.476 ms 1745.ms:19.945 25.141 29.924 4.476 1745.loss:0 1800.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:00:34 GMT 2002 1800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=34.809 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.928 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=29.925 msec 1800.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.937 msec 1800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1800.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.917/28.903/34.809/4.875 ms 1800.ms:19.917 28.903 34.809 4.875 1800.loss:0 1815.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:15:32 GMT 2002 1815.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=45.142 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.929 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.930 msec 1815.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.941 msec 1815.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1815.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1815.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 19.929/24.976/45.142/10.084 ms 1815.ms:19.929 24.976 45.142 10.084 1815.loss:0 1830.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:30:33 GMT 2002 1830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=26.380 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=29.936 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=149.945 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=29.939 msec 1830.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=29.946 msec 1830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1830.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 26.380/53.229/149.945/48.377 ms 1830.ms:26.380 53.229 149.945 48.377 1830.loss:0 1845.ping:Fri Feb 22 18:45:34 GMT 2002 1845.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=14.334 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.932 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.917 msec 1845.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.927 msec 1845.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1845.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1845.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 14.334/18.808/19.932/2.240 ms 1845.ms:14.334 18.808 19.932 2.240 1845.loss:0 1900.ping:Fri Feb 22 19:00:34 GMT 2002 1900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (216.218.194.22) from 209.125.90.78 : 56(84) bytes of data. 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=17.312 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=1 ttl=244 time=19.935 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=2 ttl=244 time=19.906 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=3 ttl=244 time=19.925 msec 1900.ping:64 bytes from pardus.catsden.net (216.218.194.22): icmp_seq=4 ttl=244 time=19.938 msec 1900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 1900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss 1900.ping:round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 17.312/19.403/19.938/1.049 ms 1900.ms:17.312 19.403 19.938 1.049 1900.loss:0 09280930.ping:Sun Sep 28 09:30:16 PDT 2008 09280930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=8.18 ms 09280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.61 ms 09280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.61 ms 09280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=12.1 ms 09280930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.58 ms 09280930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09280930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09280930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.611/7.234/12.180/2.743 ms 09280930.ms:4.611 7.234 12.180 2.743 09280930.loss:0 09281000.ping:Sun Sep 28 10:00:17 PDT 2008 09281000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.80 ms 09281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.48 ms 09281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.09 ms 09281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=12.0 ms 09281000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.06 ms 09281000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09281000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.485/6.295/12.032/2.878 ms 09281000.ms:4.485 6.295 12.032 2.878 09281000.loss:0 09281030.ping:Sun Sep 28 10:30:16 PDT 2008 09281030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=28.4 ms 09281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=6.87 ms 09281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.66 ms 09281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.36 ms 09281030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=6.76 ms 09281030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.667/10.417/28.416/9.038 ms 09281030.ms:4.667 10.417 28.416 9.038 09281030.loss:0 09281100.ping:Sun Sep 28 11:00:16 PDT 2008 09281100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.82 ms 09281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.09 ms 09281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.81 ms 09281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=8.05 ms 09281100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.85 ms 09281100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09281100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.819/5.729/8.059/1.228 ms 09281100.ms:4.819 5.729 8.059 1.228 09281100.loss:0 09281130.ping:Sun Sep 28 11:30:16 PDT 2008 09281130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.60 ms 09281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=7.22 ms 09281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.70 ms 09281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.70 ms 09281130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.49 ms 09281130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 09281130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.600/5.745/7.491/1.322 ms 09281130.ms:4.600 5.745 7.491 1.322 09281130.loss:0 09281200.ping:Sun Sep 28 12:00:16 PDT 2008 09281200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.19 ms 09281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=8.92 ms 09281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=6.21 ms 09281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.76 ms 09281200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=13.3 ms 09281200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09281200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.768/7.693/13.364/3.183 ms 09281200.ms:4.768 7.693 13.364 3.183 09281200.loss:0 09281230.ping:Sun Sep 28 12:30:15 PDT 2008 09281230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=10.2 ms 09281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.75 ms 09281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=6.64 ms 09281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=8.39 ms 09281230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=8.41 ms 09281230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.755/7.696/10.280/1.871 ms 09281230.ms:4.755 7.696 10.280 1.871 09281230.loss:0 09281300.ping:Sun Sep 28 13:00:16 PDT 2008 09281300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=7.71 ms 09281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=12.1 ms 09281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=7.03 ms 09281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=15.4 ms 09281300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.47 ms 09281300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.473/9.564/15.489/3.690 ms 09281300.ms:5.473 9.564 15.489 3.690 09281300.loss:0 09281330.ping:Sun Sep 28 13:30:16 PDT 2008 09281330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.61 ms 09281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.93 ms 09281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.43 ms 09281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.46 ms 09281330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.94 ms 09281330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.468/4.876/5.430/0.331 ms 09281330.ms:4.468 4.876 5.430 0.331 09281330.loss:0 09281400.ping:Sun Sep 28 14:00:16 PDT 2008 09281400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.93 ms 09281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.71 ms 09281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.65 ms 09281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=8.49 ms 09281400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=6.50 ms 09281400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.658/6.061/8.496/1.376 ms 09281400.ms:4.658 6.061 8.496 1.376 09281400.loss:0 09281430.ping:Sun Sep 28 14:30:16 PDT 2008 09281430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.72 ms 09281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.65 ms 09281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.56 ms 09281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.45 ms 09281430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.65 ms 09281430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09281430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.453/4.811/5.566/0.388 ms 09281430.ms:4.453 4.811 5.566 0.388 09281430.loss:0 09281500.ping:Sun Sep 28 15:00:13 PDT 2008 09281500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=10.0 ms 09281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.79 ms 09281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=9.53 ms 09281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=10.3 ms 09281500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=10.0 ms 09281500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.792/8.945/10.370/2.095 ms 09281500.ms:4.792 8.945 10.370 2.095 09281500.loss:0 09281530.ping:Sun Sep 28 15:30:16 PDT 2008 09281530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=7.03 ms 09281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=24.3 ms 09281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.72 ms 09281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.58 ms 09281530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.45 ms 09281530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.458/9.633/24.359/7.385 ms 09281530.ms:5.458 9.633 24.359 7.385 09281530.loss:0 09281600.ping:Sun Sep 28 16:00:16 PDT 2008 09281600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.71 ms 09281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.61 ms 09281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=6.12 ms 09281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.39 ms 09281600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.89 ms 09281600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09281600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.398/4.949/6.125/0.609 ms 09281600.ms:4.398 4.949 6.125 0.609 09281600.loss:0 09281630.ping:Sun Sep 28 16:30:16 PDT 2008 09281630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.84 ms 09281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.64 ms 09281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.57 ms 09281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.67 ms 09281630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.38 ms 09281630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.382/4.624/4.844/0.149 ms 09281630.ms:4.382 4.624 4.844 0.149 09281630.loss:0 09281700.ping:Sun Sep 28 17:00:16 PDT 2008 09281700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=12.7 ms 09281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.69 ms 09281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.45 ms 09281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.47 ms 09281700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.42 ms 09281700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.420/6.159/12.754/3.298 ms 09281700.ms:4.420 6.159 12.754 3.298 09281700.loss:0 09281730.ping:Sun Sep 28 17:30:16 PDT 2008 09281730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.10 ms 09281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=11.4 ms 09281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.54 ms 09281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.76 ms 09281730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.83 ms 09281730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.760/6.534/11.431/2.498 ms 09281730.ms:4.760 6.534 11.431 2.498 09281730.loss:0 09281800.ping:Sun Sep 28 18:00:16 PDT 2008 09281800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.46 ms 09281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.96 ms 09281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.3 ms 09281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.59 ms 09281800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=6.71 ms 09281800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09281800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.594/12.216/39.348/13.585 ms 09281800.ms:4.594 12.216 39.348 13.585 09281800.loss:0 09281830.ping:Sun Sep 28 18:30:17 PDT 2008 09281830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=6.58 ms 09281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=33.9 ms 09281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.02 ms 09281830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=24.9 ms 09281830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09281830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.581/21.274/33.944/12.266 ms 09281830.ms:6.581 21.274 33.944 12.266 09281830.loss:0 09281900.ping:Sun Sep 28 19:00:16 PDT 2008 09281900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=7.26 ms 09281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=14.1 ms 09281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=9.06 ms 09281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=11.9 ms 09281900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.42 ms 09281900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.269/9.971/14.175/2.685 ms 09281900.ms:7.269 9.971 14.175 2.685 09281900.loss:0 09281930.ping:Sun Sep 28 19:30:16 PDT 2008 09281930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.70 ms 09281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=6.59 ms 09281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.05 ms 09281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=6.58 ms 09281930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=15.7 ms 09281930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09281930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09281930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.709/7.729/15.705/4.061 ms 09281930.ms:4.709 7.729 15.705 4.061 09281930.loss:0 09282000.ping:Sun Sep 28 20:00:16 PDT 2008 09282000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.18 ms 09282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=6.92 ms 09282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.77 ms 09282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.67 ms 09282000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=12.4 ms 09282000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3998ms 09282000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.672/7.007/12.482/2.839 ms 09282000.ms:4.672 7.007 12.482 2.839 09282000.loss:0 09282030.ping:Sun Sep 28 20:30:16 PDT 2008 09282030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.12 ms 09282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=8.17 ms 09282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=11.4 ms 09282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=9.35 ms 09282030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=6.71 ms 09282030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09282030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.121/8.368/11.490/1.926 ms 09282030.ms:6.121 8.368 11.490 1.926 09282030.loss:0 09282100.ping:Sun Sep 28 21:00:16 PDT 2008 09282100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=29.7 ms 09282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=33.7 ms 09282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=51.9 ms 09282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=271 ms 09282100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=69.3 ms 09282100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09282100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.727/91.355/271.991/91.414 ms 09282100.ms:29.727 91.355 271.991 91.414 09282100.loss:0 09282130.ping:Sun Sep 28 21:30:16 PDT 2008 09282130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.45 ms 09282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=8.64 ms 09282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.92 ms 09282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.74 ms 09282130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.67 ms 09282130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09282130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.452/6.089/8.649/1.727 ms 09282130.ms:4.452 6.089 8.649 1.727 09282130.loss:0 09282200.ping:Sun Sep 28 22:00:17 PDT 2008 09282200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.19 ms 09282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=9.08 ms 09282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.62 ms 09282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=6.04 ms 09282200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.12 ms 09282200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09282200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.192/6.613/9.088/1.394 ms 09282200.ms:5.192 6.613 9.088 1.394 09282200.loss:0 09282230.ping:Sun Sep 28 22:30:17 PDT 2008 09282230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=132 ms 09282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=122 ms 09282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=103 ms 09282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=116 ms 09282230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=138 ms 09282230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09282230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 103.838/122.813/138.852/12.338 ms 09282230.ms:103.838 122.813 138.852 12.338 09282230.loss:0 09282300.ping:Sun Sep 28 23:00:16 PDT 2008 09282300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=9.84 ms 09282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=10.2 ms 09282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=7.07 ms 09282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.89 ms 09282300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=6.38 ms 09282300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4003ms 09282300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.382/8.281/10.212/1.509 ms 09282300.ms:6.382 8.281 10.212 1.509 09282300.loss:0 09282330.ping:Sun Sep 28 23:30:17 PDT 2008 09282330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.41 ms 09282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=8.07 ms 09282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=14.9 ms 09282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=9.03 ms 09282330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=10.6 ms 09282330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09282330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09282330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.415/9.607/14.911/3.143 ms 09282330.ms:5.415 9.607 14.911 3.143 09282330.loss:0 09290000.ping:Mon Sep 29 00:00:17 PDT 2008 09290000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=7.62 ms 09290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.03 ms 09290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.96 ms 09290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.83 ms 09290000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.98 ms 09290000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.839/5.489/7.629/1.073 ms 09290000.ms:4.839 5.489 7.629 1.073 09290000.loss:0 09290030.ping:Mon Sep 29 00:30:17 PDT 2008 09290030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.10 ms 09290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.53 ms 09290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=7.84 ms 09290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=11.4 ms 09290030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.37 ms 09290030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.536/7.653/11.413/2.058 ms 09290030.ms:5.536 7.653 11.413 2.058 09290030.loss:0 09290100.ping:Mon Sep 29 01:00:11 PDT 2008 09290100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.82 ms 09290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.61 ms 09290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.28 ms 09290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.99 ms 09290100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.21 ms 09290100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290100.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.611/5.387/6.827/0.758 ms 09290100.ms:4.611 5.387 6.827 0.758 09290100.loss:0 09290130.ping:Mon Sep 29 01:30:16 PDT 2008 09290130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.51 ms 09290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.53 ms 09290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.53 ms 09290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.95 ms 09290130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=8.36 ms 09290130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.514/5.578/8.360/1.441 ms 09290130.ms:4.514 5.578 8.360 1.441 09290130.loss:0 09290200.ping:Mon Sep 29 02:00:16 PDT 2008 09290200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.53 ms 09290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=13.4 ms 09290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.58 ms 09290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.47 ms 09290200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.47 ms 09290200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.470/6.299/13.437/3.570 ms 09290200.ms:4.470 6.299 13.437 3.570 09290200.loss:0 09290230.ping:Mon Sep 29 02:30:17 PDT 2008 09290230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=4.64 ms 09290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.66 ms 09290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.02 ms 09290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.72 ms 09290230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.40 ms 09290230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290230.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09290230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.643/4.893/5.409/0.296 ms 09290230.ms:4.643 4.893 5.409 0.296 09290230.loss:0 09290300.ping:Mon Sep 29 03:00:16 PDT 2008 09290300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=9.73 ms 09290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.64 ms 09290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.42 ms 09290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.24 ms 09290300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.95 ms 09290300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.647/7.001/9.731/1.816 ms 09290300.ms:4.647 7.001 9.731 1.816 09290300.loss:0 09290330.ping:Mon Sep 29 03:30:17 PDT 2008 09290330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=7.00 ms 09290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=12.5 ms 09290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=6.41 ms 09290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.30 ms 09290330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=10.0 ms 09290330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.300/8.248/12.527/2.646 ms 09290330.ms:5.300 8.248 12.527 2.646 09290330.loss:0 09290400.ping:Mon Sep 29 04:00:17 PDT 2008 09290400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=25.8 ms 09290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=23.8 ms 09290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=17.2 ms 09290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=23.6 ms 09290400.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=17.0 ms 09290400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290400.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290400.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.008/21.513/25.810/3.664 ms 09290400.ms:17.008 21.513 25.810 3.664 09290400.loss:0 09290430.ping:Mon Sep 29 04:30:16 PDT 2008 09290430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.76 ms 09290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=7.67 ms 09290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=14.5 ms 09290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=17.4 ms 09290430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=12.7 ms 09290430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.769/11.639/17.495/4.338 ms 09290430.ms:5.769 11.639 17.495 4.338 09290430.loss:0 09290500.ping:Mon Sep 29 05:00:07 PDT 2008 09290500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=17.3 ms 09290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=28.1 ms 09290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=10.8 ms 09290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=27.1 ms 09290500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=9.72 ms 09290500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 9.725/18.672/28.183/7.817 ms 09290500.ms:9.725 18.672 28.183 7.817 09290500.loss:0 09290530.ping:Mon Sep 29 05:30:16 PDT 2008 09290530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.14 ms 09290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=10.0 ms 09290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.36 ms 09290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.79 ms 09290530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=6.17 ms 09290530.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290530.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290530.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.369/6.698/10.007/1.679 ms 09290530.ms:5.369 6.698 10.007 1.679 09290530.loss:0 09290600.ping:Mon Sep 29 06:00:16 PDT 2008 09290600.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.87 ms 09290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=6.86 ms 09290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=8.13 ms 09290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.96 ms 09290600.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.80 ms 09290600.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290600.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290600.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.805/6.727/8.138/0.837 ms 09290600.ms:5.805 6.727 8.138 0.837 09290600.loss:0 09290630.ping:Mon Sep 29 06:30:07 PDT 2008 09290630.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.75 ms 09290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=7.13 ms 09290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=6.88 ms 09290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.92 ms 09290630.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.62 ms 09290630.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290630.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290630.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.754/7.264/7.922/0.450 ms 09290630.ms:6.754 7.264 7.922 0.450 09290630.loss:0 09290700.ping:Mon Sep 29 07:00:16 PDT 2008 09290700.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=9.43 ms 09290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=6.67 ms 09290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=7.29 ms 09290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=9.03 ms 09290700.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.91 ms 09290700.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290700.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290700.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.917/7.670/9.431/1.356 ms 09290700.ms:5.917 7.670 9.431 1.356 09290700.loss:0 09290730.ping:Mon Sep 29 07:30:16 PDT 2008 09290730.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=19.4 ms 09290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=20.9 ms 09290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=47.5 ms 09290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=49.6 ms 09290730.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=23.8 ms 09290730.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290730.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09290730.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.457/32.306/49.690/13.424 ms 09290730.ms:19.457 32.306 49.690 13.424 09290730.loss:0 09290800.ping:Mon Sep 29 08:00:17 PDT 2008 09290800.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=9.75 ms 09290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.82 ms 09290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=12.4 ms 09290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.11 ms 09290800.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.86 ms 09290800.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290800.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09290800.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.823/7.797/12.435/2.942 ms 09290800.ms:4.823 7.797 12.435 2.942 09290800.loss:0 09290830.ping:Mon Sep 29 08:30:16 PDT 2008 09290830.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.17 ms 09290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=4.42 ms 09290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.45 ms 09290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=4.98 ms 09290830.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=12.3 ms 09290830.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290830.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09290830.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.428/6.474/12.330/2.996 ms 09290830.ms:4.428 6.474 12.330 2.996 09290830.loss:0 09290900.ping:Mon Sep 29 09:00:16 PDT 2008 09290900.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.75 ms 09290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=9.96 ms 09290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=6.35 ms 09290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.47 ms 09290900.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=5.31 ms 09290900.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290900.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09290900.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.317/6.971/9.961/1.663 ms 09290900.ms:5.317 6.971 9.961 1.663 09290900.loss:0 09290930.ping:Mon Sep 29 09:30:16 PDT 2008 09290930.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=10.8 ms 09290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=10.9 ms 09290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=7.02 ms 09290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=10.5 ms 09290930.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=12.3 ms 09290930.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09290930.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09290930.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.026/10.336/12.325/1.764 ms 09290930.ms:7.026 10.336 12.325 1.764 09290930.loss:0 09291000.ping:Mon Sep 29 10:00:16 PDT 2008 09291000.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=7.57 ms 09291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=8.86 ms 09291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=10.1 ms 09291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=9.74 ms 09291000.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=12.3 ms 09291000.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291000.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09291000.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 7.577/9.744/12.346/1.577 ms 09291000.ms:7.577 9.744 12.346 1.577 09291000.loss:0 09291030.ping:Mon Sep 29 10:30:16 PDT 2008 09291030.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=5.61 ms 09291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=6.05 ms 09291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.28 ms 09291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=5.09 ms 09291030.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=6.03 ms 09291030.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291030.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09291030.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 5.094/5.616/6.053/0.390 ms 09291030.ms:5.094 5.616 6.053 0.390 09291030.loss:0 09291100.ping:Mon Sep 29 11:00:16 PDT 2008 09291100.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6094 ms 09291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5085 ms 09291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4089 ms 09291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=3090 ms 09291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=2091 ms 09291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=6 ttl=57 time=1098 ms 09291100.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=7 ttl=57 time=102 ms 09291100.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291100.ping:7 packets transmitted, 7 received, 0% packet loss, time 6009ms 09291100.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 102.967/3093.460/6094.883/1996.279 ms, pipe 7 09291100.ms:102.967 3093.460 6094.883 1996.279 09291100.loss:0 09291130.ping:Mon Sep 29 11:30:16 PDT 2008 09291130.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=12.7 ms 09291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=5.71 ms 09291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=4.79 ms 09291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=8.54 ms 09291130.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=7.69 ms 09291130.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291130.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09291130.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.797/7.894/12.711/2.756 ms 09291130.ms:4.797 7.894 12.711 2.756 09291130.loss:0 09291200.ping:Mon Sep 29 12:00:16 PDT 2008 09291200.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=10.0 ms 09291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=14.2 ms 09291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=5.80 ms 09291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=6.85 ms 09291200.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=4.66 ms 09291200.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291200.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09291200.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.668/8.315/14.222/3.451 ms 09291200.ms:4.668 8.315 14.222 3.451 09291200.loss:0 09291230.ping:Mon Sep 29 12:30:16 PDT 2008 09291230.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291230.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=15.1 ms 09291230.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291230.ping:9 packets transmitted, 1 received, 88% packet loss, time 8001ms 09291230.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 15.113/15.113/15.113/0.000 ms 09291230.ms:15.113 15.113 15.113 0.000 09291230.loss:88 09291300.ping:Mon Sep 29 13:00:16 PDT 2008 09291300.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=6.81 ms 09291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=8.94 ms 09291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=8.84 ms 09291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=7.17 ms 09291300.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=8.16 ms 09291300.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291300.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3997ms 09291300.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 6.819/7.989/8.946/0.867 ms 09291300.ms:6.819 7.989 8.946 0.867 09291300.loss:0 09291330.ping:Mon Sep 29 13:30:16 PDT 2008 09291330.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=11.1 ms 09291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=15.3 ms 09291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=15.9 ms 09291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=22.7 ms 09291330.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=13.7 ms 09291330.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291330.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4000ms 09291330.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.120/15.794/22.785/3.878 ms 09291330.ms:11.120 15.794 22.785 3.878 09291330.loss:0 09291400.ping:Mon Sep 29 14:00:16 PDT 2008 09291400.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291400.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291400.ping:9 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 8009ms 09291400.ms:399 399 399 09291400.loss:100 09291430.ping:Mon Sep 29 14:30:07 PDT 2008 09291430.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=92.4 ms 09291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=106 ms 09291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=130 ms 09291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=106 ms 09291430.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=209 ms 09291430.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291430.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 3999ms 09291430.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 92.452/129.078/209.529/42.050 ms 09291430.ms:92.452 129.078 209.529 42.050 09291430.loss:0 09291500.ping:Mon Sep 29 15:00:16 PDT 2008 09291500.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=121 ms 09291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=98.4 ms 09291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=44.6 ms 09291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=43.4 ms 09291500.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=59.0 ms 09291500.ping:--- buda.lag.net ping statistics --- 09291500.ping:5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4001ms 09291500.ping:rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 43.497/73.452/121.553/31.215 ms 09291500.ms:43.497 73.452 121.553 31.215 09291500.loss:0 09291530.ping:Mon Sep 29 15:30:16 PDT 2008 09291530.ping:PING buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85) 56(84) bytes of data. 09291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=275 ms 09291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=298 ms 09291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=26.7 ms 09291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=522 ms 09291530.ping:64 bytes from buda.lag.net (64.62.148.85): icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 t